When Google Cloud releases its annual cybersecurity forecast, the industry pays attention. The 2026 edition is not another list of predictions or buzzwords. It is a mirror of what is already happening in the field, shaped by the daily observations of Mandiant incident responders, threat intelligence analysts, and Google’s own security engineers. But reading it as simply a report misses the point.
The story beneath the charts and briefings is much bigger: the balance between human decision and algorithmic automation is starting to shift. Artificial intelligence is no longer a supporting tool for security teams. It is becoming a full participant in the cyber conflict, both as a weapon and as a defense mechanism. And that means the battlefield of 2026 will look nothing like the one we have known.
The report describes how adversaries are fully embracing AI to scale attacks faster and with higher precision. It is not a hypothetical scenario. Threat actors are already training small language models for phishing, impersonation, and reconnaissance. In 2026, this is expected to become standard practice.
One of the most critical evolutions is prompt injection. This technique allows attackers to manipulate AI systems by feeding them hidden instructions inside text or data. The result is an obedient model that follows the attacker’s will while pretending to assist the user. This attack vector is simple, cheap, and devastatingly efficient because it turns the AI itself into the breach point.
Equally concerning is the growth of AI-enabled social engineering. Groups such as ShinyHunters are reported to be combining voice cloning and behavioral modeling to impersonate executives or IT staff over phone calls. The realism of synthetic voices makes traditional awareness training almost obsolete.
Google’s forecast also introduces the idea of the AI agent paradigm — a future where autonomous AI systems perform operational decisions without human initiation. This transition will force organizations to rethink identity management entirely. Machine identities will need the same governance, privilege limits, and audit trails as human employees. Without it, the “shadow agent” problem will escalate, where unmonitored AI assistants silently execute sensitive tasks beyond security’s reach.
For defenders, the shift offers opportunity as well as risk. The forecast envisions a “supercharged analyst” era, where AI automates triage, enrichment, and reporting, allowing human analysts to focus on strategy and judgment. The real challenge will not be how to use AI, but how to trust it responsibly.
Ransomware remains the most financially destructive threat, but the report shows how the ecosystem has become more complex. It is now a multilayered economy, not a single type of attack. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, 2,302 victims were listed on leak sites, the highest number ever recorded. The average ransomware campaign no longer stops at encryption. It now includes data theft, extortion, harassment, and disruption across entire supply chains.
Attackers are targeting virtualization layers and enterprise infrastructure that were once considered too low-level to exploit. Compromising a hypervisor, for example, allows them to shut down hundreds of virtual machines at once, bypassing endpoint defenses entirely. Few organizations have visibility into that layer, which makes it the perfect blind spot.
A new and more subtle shift is happening on the blockchain. Google calls it the on-chain cybercrime economy. As cryptocurrency adoption increases, threat actors are moving parts of their operations directly to the blockchain.
Command-and-control servers, data exfiltration mechanisms, and monetization pipelines are being rebuilt on decentralized platforms where takedowns are almost impossible.
Defenders who have not yet learned blockchain forensics will soon be unable to trace or understand this activity. Ironically, the permanence of the blockchain also makes it a double-edged sword for criminals, since every wallet transaction leaves a public trail. The investigation tools of 2026 will need to read these trails with precision, combining blockchain analytics with traditional threat intelligence.
The report’s geopolitical chapters underline a sobering reality: the digital front of global conflict has stabilized into a permanent condition.
Russia is expected to move from short-term wartime tactics toward long-term global espionage, building persistent access into Western infrastructure. China continues to operate the largest state-backed cyber apparatus, focusing on semiconductors, AI technology, and third-party supply chains. Iran is blurring the lines between propaganda, espionage, and cyber sabotage, while North Korea is turning cryptocurrency theft into a national revenue stream, expanding its global presence under fake identities and IT contracts.
Each of these nations treats cyberspace as a strategic tool for influence, not merely for disruption. And each demonstrates that the separation between state and non-state actors is thinning. The private sector is becoming an indirect participant in geopolitical cyber operations, whether it wants to or not.
What stands out in Google’s report is not just the detail of the threats, but what remains between the lines. The industry has reached a stage where speed of adaptation defines security maturity more than the number of tools deployed. The same AI that enables real-time investigation for defenders is also training itself through open data to attack faster.
At ThreatMon, we see this tension daily in our telemetry and client operations. The organizations that survive are those that have already accepted that AI cannot be fully controlled, only directed. The goal is not to suppress automation, but to govern it with discipline. Every AI system, every model prompt, and every data stream must be treated as a potential threat surface.
The real transformation will happen when defenders start building AI observability layers, systems that monitor how AI makes decisions, what data it consumes, and when it deviates from expected behavior. Without that transparency, organizations will be fighting blind.
The 2026 landscape will not be defined by who has the best technology, but by who maintains the clearest visibility into what their technology is actually doing.
The core message of Google’s report is that the perimeter has dissolved, but so has the human monopoly on decision-making. The defenders of 2026 will be those who understand that cybersecurity is no longer a contest of tools, but of judgment. Machines can predict, analyze, and respond, but only humans can decide what should not be automated.
The coming year will test that distinction like never before.
More posts
Share this article
Found it interesting? Don’t hesitate to share it to wow your friends or colleagues
Subscribe to our blog newsletter to follow the latest posts
